Should Judges Be Allowed To Use Foreign Precedents?
The principle of stare decisis has only been a relatively recent legal development, with its core roots being formed in the 18th century . Courts now bind themselves to the judgements of the past in order to adjudicate in the future. Assuming that a reason why precedent is followed is that it provides the reasoning necessary to pass judgement in current cases , it must follow that courts are able to look beyond their national borders and adopt the judgements (and the reasoning it contains) in order to decide cases. Nevertheless, this essay will argue that the use of foreign precedents will give judges too much power and disrupt the ability of an individual to obey the law. Firstly, judges will have too much power should they be allowed to use foreign precedents. Currently, the only room judges have to manoeuvre around a precedent set by previous judgements is through proving that those precedents have no relevance to the case on trial . They would otherwise be bound to make decisi...